News Article

Domestic abuse issues in child arrangements cases

Domestic abuse issues in child arrangements cases have been considered last month on appeal from a refusal to re-open the courts previous refusal to make findings of fact, according to Cheshire family solicitors Stonehewer Moss. Domestic abuse issues in child arrangements cases are of necessity at the forefront of the minds of judges tasked with managing and deciding applications for parents to arrange how a child will see the other parent or which home the children will call home. The rules of the Family Court are available to research on-line and are called the Family Procedure Rules 2010; these are supplemented by what are called Practice Directions which detail the correct procedure for each issue. Domestic abuse in child arrangements cases is dealt with by Practice Direction 12J.

The court has, on occasion, to deal with a dispute about what happened between parents or towards children. If considered necessary to the disposal of the case, such a dispute can be resolved by a hearing before welfare issues are decided that is called a finding of fact. In the writers experience, the finding of fact was a regular fixture pre the 2008 financial trouble, when cafcass regularly refused to consider what is best for the welfare of a child until a costly finding of fact hearing had taken place but this cafcass lead practice seemed to disappear with the budgets of the relevant departments. Nevertheless PD 12J  exists to stress to the court the importance of considering the potential impact of domestic abuse upon a child. It is a moot point whether the courts have correctly applied 12J and the fact the PD has been up-dated in October may answer that question. The appeal case last month gives some interesting guidance.

The appeal case can be researched on-line and is called LR v LG (Re-opening finding of fact) 2017. Here the court had been presented with domestic abuse issue but not made significant findings. Subsequently the father was convicted in the criminal court. The mother at a further stage in the family court made an application to re-open the findings of fact. It was refused. The appeal has been granted on the basis that the criminal court and no prior family court had made finding as to whether there had been a pattern of harassment. The judge on appeal emphasised the PD12J requirement on the court not to  expose child or parent to risk of harm at each relevant stage in the case; the old trope many of you will have heard in court that the allegations were historic and mum had allowed contact since was not good enough. If there is a risk of harm impacting on child or parent the court should consider whether findings of fact are needed. Such hearings can take place at the same time as the welfare hearing but it will depend on the issues in the case. These words in the appeal judgement have particular power, “..court must be careful to ensure that significant issues are not overlooked. Sometimes a pattern of harassment and other forms of domestic abuse is only discernible by conducting a broader examination of the allegations.” The early disposal of the issue based on a cursory examination of sample allegations may be wrong. Domestic abuse issues in child arrangements cases has clear procedural rules and past decisions can be re-considered.

For advice negotiation and representation in child arrangements cases please call 01606 872200 e mail or visit


Facebook Posts

Unable to display Facebook posts.
Show error

Error: Error validating access token: Session has expired on Saturday, 09-Mar-19 13:12:58 PST. The current time is Wednesday, 23-Oct-19 05:03:30 PDT.
Type: OAuthException
Code: 190
Subcode: 463
Please refer to our Error Message Reference.

Get In Touch

Contact our expert team of friendly Northwich lawyers

FREE advice

Refer A Friend

Know someone who is looking for a good injury lawyer? Get more than just a thank you for recommending us to your family or friends.

See Details

Latest News

Keep up to date with all the latest news and events from our friendly team.

Read More

Rate Stonehewermoss Solicitors

Stonehewer Moss Solicitors, Citadel House, Solvay Road, Northwich, Cheshire, CW8 4DP

Solicitors in Northwich covering Chester, Crewe, Knutsford, Macclesfield, Middlewich, Northwich, Runcorn, Sandbach, Warrington, Winsford, and across Cheshire.

Stonehewer Moss Solicitors is a trading style of the Stonehewer Moss Limited, Registered in England No. 542 6583 and PIPLaw
which is a firm of solicitors authorised and regulated by the the Solicitors Regulation Authority No. 471159

Contact Us

Contact Us

To get in touch simply fill out the short form below and we will reply very shortly, and definitely within 24 hours. The online enquiry form is completely safe and secure, and your details will not be available to anyone other than Stonehewer Moss Solicitors.

Contact Form

This website uses Cookies to improve your browsing experience and to help with our marketing. You can read more about removing Cookies here.

I'm fine with this